From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. There was the Go, Go, and Go. One step forward, two steps back? Kepler GeForce This kept the MX in production while the was discontinued.

Uploader: Nile
Date Added: 25 June 2006
File Size: 37.74 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 59838
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

It also owed some of its design heritage to Nvidia’s high-end CAD products, and in performance-critical non-game applications it was remarkably effective.

NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000

In motion-video applications, the GeForce4 MX offered new functionality. GeForce 8 9 In other projects Wikimedia Commons. However, because the GPU was not designed for the mobile space, it had thermal output similar to the desktop part. Despite geoforcee name, the short-lived Go is not part of this lineup, it was instead derived from the Ti line.

In practice its main competitors were chipset-integrated graphics solutions, such as Intel’s G and Nvidia’s own nForce 2, but its main advantage geoforde those was multiple-monitor support; Intel’s geoforcs did not have this at all, and the nForce 2’s multi-monitor support was much inferior to what the MX series offered.

In latethere was an attempt to form a fourth family, also for the laptop market, the only member of it being the GeForce4 Go NV28M which was derived from the Ti line. This caused problems for notebook manufacturers, especially with regards to battery life.

GeForce 4 series – Wikipedia

Between capability and competenceTech Report, April 29, The GeForce 4 Ti enjoyed considerable longevity compared to its higher-clocked peers. Using third party drivers can, among other things, invalidate warranties.


GeForce 2 4 MX. One possible solution to the lack of driver support for the Go family is the third party Omega Drivers. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Yeoforce was very similar to its predecessor; the main differences were higher core and memory clock rates, a revised memory controller known as Lightspeed Memory Architecture IIupdated pixel shaders with new instructions for Direct3D 8.

Nvidia’s eventual answer to the Radeon was the GeForce FXbut despite the ‘s DirectX 9 features it did not have a significant performance increase compared to the MX even in DirectX 7.

The two new models were the MXX, which was clocked slightly faster than the original MX, and the MXSE, which had a narrower memory bus, and was intended as a replacement of sorts for the MX There were 3 initial models: Retrieved from ” https: One step forward, two steps back? Despite harsh criticism by gaming enthusiasts, the GeForce4 MX was a market success. When ATI launched its Radeon Pro in Septemberit performed about the same as the MX, but had crucial advantages with better single-texturing performance and proper support of DirectX 8 shaders.

DirectX 9 goes mainstreamTech Report, November 27, This tactic didn’t work however, for two reasons. This page was last edited on 10 Octoberat The MX, which had been discontinued by this point, was never replaced.

NVIDIA 3DFR4000P GeForce Mx4000 Legacy Vintage PCI 128mb VGA Video Card

Though its lineage was of the past-generation GeForce 2, the GeForce4 MX did incorporate bandwidth and fill rate-saving techniques, dual-monitor support, and a multi-sampling anti-aliasing unit from the Ti series; the improved bit DDR memory controller was crucial to solving the bandwidth limitations that plagued the GeForce and GeForce 2 lines.


At half the cost of thethe remained the best balance between price and performance until the launch of the ATI Radeon Pro at the end geofofce Bringing mobile gaming to new heights”.

Retrieved May 15, At the time of their introduction, Nvidia’s main products were the entry-level GeForce 2 MXthe midrange GeForce4 MX models released the same time as the Ti and Tiand the older but still high-performance GeForce 3 demoted to the upper mid-range or gekforce niche.

Comparison of Nvidia graphics processing units. Firstly, the Ti was perceived as being not good enough for those who wanted top performance who preferred the Tinor those who wanted good value for money who typically chose the Geofircecausing the Ti to be a pointless middle ground of the two.

ATI’s Radeon Pro graphics card: Views Read Edit View history.